Re: Suggestions for making private packages?
- Reply: Matthias Fechner : "Re: Suggestions for making private packages?"
- In reply to: Pat Maddox: "Suggestions for making private packages?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 23:12:49 UTC
On 11 Apr 2022, at 23:58, Pat Maddox wrote: > We are considering using FreeBSD to deploy the proprietary software we > build. > > I am interested in using the package system to build and distribute > the software to our servers. I believe this will help us maintain > consistency and cleanliness. > > Right now I have a few ideas of how to do this: > > 1. Fork the ports tree, and add a directory for our software. Build as > usual. > 2. Use portshaker to overlay our software onto the ports tree. > 3. Use pkg-create directly. > > For those of you who write and deploy private software on FreeBSD, > what do you suggest? > > Thanks, > Pat I have made progress on this two different ways, using poudriere [1] and `pkg create` [2]. I’m not sure how to fit this into a CI / CD workflow. I want to build and deploy the latest version to staging, and then periodically promote that version to prod. I don’t want to have to bump the port Makefile GH_TAGNAME with every commit that passes tests. Maybe that’s unavoidable? Porter’s handbook docs say “Using the name of a branch here is incorrect” for GH_TAGNAME [3]. How can I configure poudriere to build the latest version of our repo, as well as a version that we’ve designated for release? I think it makes sense to use the same build mechanism (i.e. poudriere) for everything, rather than using `pkg create` for bleeding edge builds and poudriere for releases. Pat [1] https://github.com/patmaddox/my-freebsd-ports/blob/main/devel/ex_ample/Makefile [2] https://github.com/patmaddox/ex_ample/blob/main/Makefile [3] https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/makefiles/#makefile-master_sites-github