Re: nvidia-driver and no update in /usr/ports/UPDATING
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 02:34:57 UTC
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 00:00:34 +0100 tech-lists <tech-lists@zyxst.net> wrote: > So *WHY* were the consequences of PR 261666 not in /usr/ports/UPDATING? > nvidia-driver was updated to (560) i think. 5-something.. the instance > before was moved to nvidia-driver-470 as it's now legacy. That's great > and all, but *WHY* the *F**K* isn't in *UPDATING??!??!?!?!* You know if this was a commercial product for which you were paying for support and you spoke like that to a support worker you would get hung up on and blacklisted for verbal abuse. It is no more acceptable in text, especially since you are talking to users - I very much doubt that anyone involved will see your rant. Now to answer your question - there's nothing in UPDATING because the port maintainer for that port didn't put anything in there when they made the change. So if you want to know why you could look up the maintainer (listed in the Makefile) and ask them *politely* about it - maybe they had to rush a child to hospital or attend some social event and forgot to do it. Whatever the reason they deserve politeness and gratitude for what they have done not abuse for what they haven't. Or you could hurl anonymous abuse at the uninvolved with thinly disguised obscenities in a public forum to no effect whatsoever except to make yourself look foolish. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>