Re: removing mutt patches
- Reply: Derek Schrock : "Re: removing mutt patches"
- In reply to: Felix Palmen : "Re: removing mutt patches"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 22:04:35 UTC
On 2023-05-05 20:19 +0200, Felix Palmen wrote: <snip> > > So, again IMHO, let's stick to the "only patch ustream when really > needed to fix something" policy with Mutt as well. I've used Mutt from the first version when I was eager to switch from Pine. I have to admit I have never heard of NeoMutt. It would be nice to have a message in pkg-message explaining the port is now vanilla outside of fixes and anyone looking for former patches should try NeoMutt. I'm not a fan of advertising alternate software but in this case it's still Mutt but users looking for a similar experience to the old port may want to try out NeoMutt I know I will be looking at it to see what's up. Amar.