From nobody Fri May 05 22:04:35 2023 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QCl8q6F6Jz49rjK for ; Fri, 5 May 2023 22:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from verm@darkbeer.org) Received: from mx.coeval.ca (mx.coeval.ca [184.75.211.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QCl8p5lxTz3kCP for ; Fri, 5 May 2023 22:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from verm@darkbeer.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=darkbeer.org header.s=mail header.b=G91mQ9ok; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of verm@darkbeer.org designates 184.75.211.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=verm@darkbeer.org; dmarc=none Received: from mx.darkbeer.org (unknown [192.168.211.20]) by mx.coeval.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC1A43605C for ; Fri, 5 May 2023 22:04:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=darkbeer.org; s=mail; t=1683324275; bh=KhSZ2IHj4JU2S0L0CtFdsub5nS5HrGw9XoIWEnh9IAg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=G91mQ9okjLd4qGrK4NWUt8WfnaQSvr5FaDd1bu1YVeacn9BkkGcJ7KvH02KCaBfP5 K36xBfBYqn8Eoy7a4dQdcespMMlXfe+B2ZRiOB+n5FRDuuumubtfOGWA2kBsFC7aPN hZCwGY6RnX06DA+yFNoEudlD8y1rkkrZbULymzmE= Received: by mx.darkbeer.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 09C54470C86; Fri, 5 May 2023 22:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 22:04:35 +0000 From: Amar Takhar To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removing mutt patches Message-ID: <20230505220435.GA5355@darkbeer.org> Mail-Followup-To: ports@freebsd.org References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.996]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:184.75.211.21]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[darkbeer.org:s=mail]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[darkbeer.org:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[darkbeer.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:32489, ipnet:184.75.211.0/24, country:CA]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QCl8p5lxTz3kCP X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2023-05-05 20:19 +0200, Felix Palmen wrote: > > So, again IMHO, let's stick to the "only patch ustream when really > needed to fix something" policy with Mutt as well. I've used Mutt from the first version when I was eager to switch from Pine. I have to admit I have never heard of NeoMutt. It would be nice to have a message in pkg-message explaining the port is now vanilla outside of fixes and anyone looking for former patches should try NeoMutt. I'm not a fan of advertising alternate software but in this case it's still Mutt but users looking for a similar experience to the old port may want to try out NeoMutt I know I will be looking at it to see what's up. Amar.