Re: Porting forks
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:26:56 UTC
Hello Matthew, Well, I was thinking that this should be the best solution for this port because fork respects original history and code. I'm stucked in https://github.com/Xenoveritas/abuse/issues/26 about correct license(s) to use on port. Thanks, Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> escreveu no dia quarta, 22/02/2023 à(s) 08:40: > On 22/02/2023 08:22, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > I'm thinking porting a fork from games/abuse_sdl located at > > https://github.com/Xenoveritas/abuse > > > > My doubt is what name should port have because fork have exacly same > name. > > > > Any help is welcome. > > Given that the main difference from the current port and the fork you're > looking at is the build system, and development on the original upstream > code seems to have ceased years ago, so the actual game content between > the two forks would be the same, there seems to me to be no particularly > good reason to have both the original and the forked version in the tree. > > Why not just take maintainership of games/abuse_sdl and update it to use > the forked code? > > Cheers, > > Matthew > -- Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD Committer (ports)