[Bug 263655] www/apache24: Remove automatic mpm fallback configuration
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 12:15:16 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263655 Bug ID: 263655 Summary: www/apache24: Remove automatic mpm fallback configuration Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: apache@FreeBSD.org Reporter: ports@skyforge.at Assignee: apache@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(apache@FreeBSD.org) Created attachment 233582 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=233582&action=edit www/apache24: Remove automatic mpm fallback configuration I'd like to propose a patch to remove the automatic fallback generation with mpm_prefork for www/apache24. Currently the apache24 package greps for a present MPM configuration in http.conf and creates a fallback configuration in modules.d, which is included by default. I feel that this is problematic for a variety of reasons: * It doesn't account for modular configurations: If the loading of an MPM module takes place in an included configuration (as would be the case for most modularized configuration schemes, which are increadibly useful and common), the script generates a fallback configuration that may cause apache to either load the wrong mpm module on restart, or cause it to fail starting alltogether. * It doesn't preserve changes to the file: Even if I keep the 000_mpm_prefork_fallback.conf configuration but uncomment the LoadModule statement, the configuration is simply overwritten on the next update/reinstallation of the package. * From a philosophical perspective, it feels like it's overstepping boundaries: We nowadays ship with a sample configuration that includes a well-intended default LoadModule statement for mpm_prefork. Whichever way the user decides to modify and diverge from that default configuration should be up to them. Creating non-sample configurations in places that would be sourced by default feels like it's taking things a step too far. Judging from the commit history, I think there was once a point for this kind of behaviour to help with the migration from a static to a dynamic MPM backend. But this was in 2015, so I think it's time to reevaluate this and, perhaps, move on. As a minor note: I think the configuration as it stands right now doesn't even work properly anymore. At least my apache complains with the following: Syntax error on line 21 of /usr/local/etc/apache24/modules.d/000_mpm_prefork_fallback.conf: Cannot load libexec/apache24/mod_mpm_prefork.so into server: Cannot open "/usr/local/etc/apache24/libexec/apache24/mod_mpm_prefork.so" I've attached a patch that (I think?) removes this functionality in its entirety, as it really shouldn't be necessary anymore. All configurations had ample time migrating and new installations come with a sane default anyway. We could still preserve a warning on install, but I'm really not sure that's necessary anymore. In any case it would make my own personal use case a bit nicer to deal with, as I have split the individual modules and their configurations in seperate files in modules.d and currently need to pay attention to this everytime I update apache24, but I'd love to hear feedback and different opinions on this. :) Cheers, Sascha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.