Re: removing RIP/RIPng (routed/route6d)

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:03 PM Lexi Winter <lexi@le-fay.org> wrote:
> (..)
> almost anything would be useful for someone, somewhere.  for example,
> i'd quite like to see a basic Wayland compositor (such as hikari) and a
> terminal emulator in the base system, because that's a bit nicer to use
> than vt(4) if you just need to occasionally manage a system via the
> framebuffer console.  i feel fairly confident to say that this would be
> useful to a greater number of people than an implementation of RIP.

If that takes around 10MB its worth considering.. may be helpful for
visual oci management :-)

> would people objecting to the removal of routed also advocate for
> putting window(1) back into base?  (this is not a rhetorical question,
> 'yes' is a perfectly reasonable answer.)

The subtle difference between "removing RIP/RIPng (routed/route6d)"
and "[base->ports] moving RIP/RIPng (routed/route6d) to ports" :-)

Have a good day folks :-)

-- 
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info