Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)
- Reply: David Chisnall : "Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)"
- Reply: Jan Knepper : "Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)"
- In reply to: David Chisnall : "Re: The Case for Rust (in any system)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 07:39:09 UTC
-------- David Chisnall writes: > On 8 Sep 2024, at 22:11, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > > The logical progression of C++ adoption would start with using a C++ > > compiler as a better C compiler. > > Compiling C as C++ will *normally* give the same output, but not always. But do you agree that the C++ compiler's take on things make more sense than the C compiler's in these cases ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.