Re: list of valid ABI combinations

> On Dec 10, 2023, at 7:27 PM, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> On Dec 9, 2023, at 10:02, Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> wrote:
> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> . . .
>>>> 
>>>> The name list in the middle (/bin/sh context):
>>>> 
>>>> # fetch https://pkg.freebsd.org/index.html
>>>> index.html                                            3606  B  103 MBps    00s
>>>> 
>>>> # grep FreeBSD: index.html | sed -e 's@.*\(FreeBSD:[^ <]*\).*@\1@' | sort
>>>> FreeBSD:12:aarch64
>>>> FreeBSD:12:amd64
>>>> FreeBSD:12:armv6
>>>> FreeBSD:12:armv7
>>>> FreeBSD:12:i386
>>>> FreeBSD:13:aarch64
>>>> FreeBSD:13:amd64
>>>> FreeBSD:13:armv6
>>>> FreeBSD:13:armv7
>>>> FreeBSD:13:i386
>>>> FreeBSD:13:powerpc
>>>> FreeBSD:13:powerpc64
>>>> FreeBSD:13:powerpc64le
>>>> FreeBSD:14:aarch64
>>>> FreeBSD:14:amd64
>>>> FreeBSD:14:armv6
>>>> FreeBSD:14:armv7
>>>> FreeBSD:14:i386
>>>> FreeBSD:14:powerpc
>>>> FreeBSD:14:powerpc64
>>>> FreeBSD:14:powerpc64le
>>>> FreeBSD:15:aarch64
>>>> FreeBSD:15:amd64
>>>> FreeBSD:15:armv6
>>>> FreeBSD:15:armv7
>>>> FreeBSD:15:i386
>>>> FreeBSD:15:powerpc
>>>> FreeBSD:15:powerpc64
>>>> FreeBSD:15:powerpc64le
> 
> The below is mostly about what I currently see in the packages
> tables (ABI/latest/quarterly) that I've just looked at.
> 
> I do not see FreeBSD:15:powerpc64le showing on on FreshPorts yet.
> But https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:powerpc64le/latest/ is
> populated with data from 2023-Nov-29 (as  shown in my web browser)
> and the above list shows FreeBSD:15:powerpc64le .
> 
> FreeBSD:14:powerpc64le and FreeBSD:13:powerpc64le are similar but
> the more up to date data are in (2023-Dec dates):
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:powerpc64le/quarterly/
> and:
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:13:powerpc64le/quarterly/
> ( as documented on https://pkg.freebsd.org/ ).
> 
> FreeBSD:14:powerpc and FreeBSD:13:powerpc (32-bit powerpc)
> are similar but the more up to date data are in (2023-Dec and
> 2023-Nov dates):
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:powerpc/quarterly/
> and:
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:13:powerpc/quarterly/
> ( as documented on https://pkg.freebsd.org/ ).
> 
> By contrast, FreeBSD:15:powerpc has no data in:
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:powerpc/latest/
> so its not showing may be as expected. (Not documented on
> https://pkg.freebsd.org/ as being empty.)
> 
> The various FreeBSD:*:mips64 still show up (version numbers
> being "-") but are not in the list above.
> 
> There are also FreeBSD:12:mips , FreeBSD:13:mips , and
> FreeBSD:14:mips (32-bit mips) showing (version numbers being "-").
> (No 32 bit mips shown for FreeBSD:15:* .)
> 
> I also see odd popup status results for some cells with version
> numbers showing. Take, for example, devel/llvm17:
> FreeBSD:15:powerpc64 two "17.0.1" entries have popups that report:
> 
> QUOTE
> repo not found
> never imported
> 2023-12-1-0 23:00 - last checked by FreshPorts
> END QUOTE
> 
> I'd expect that sort of thing for the version number being just "-"
> but there is a version number showing.

I think that thing has resolved itself.  Not sure how.

However, I think a delete of the packages_raw table needs to happen more often.

For the sake of tracking, let's hold further conversation at:

   https://github.com/FreshPorts/freshports/issues/511

> 
> I'm not sure if some of this might be expected or not.

It's not to be expected.

At first I thought it was my SQL query for displaying the results. Now I think it's spurious leftover data.

-- 
Dan Langille
dan@langille.org