Re: list of valid ABI combinations
- Reply: Dan Langille: "Re: list of valid ABI combinations"
- Reply: Dan Langille : "Re: list of valid ABI combinations"
- In reply to: Dan Langille : "Re: list of valid ABI combinations"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:27:07 UTC
On Dec 9, 2023, at 10:02, Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> . . . >>> >>> The name list in the middle (/bin/sh context): >>> >>> # fetch https://pkg.freebsd.org/index.html >>> index.html 3606 B 103 MBps 00s >>> >>> # grep FreeBSD: index.html | sed -e 's@.*\(FreeBSD:[^ <]*\).*@\1@' | sort >>> FreeBSD:12:aarch64 >>> FreeBSD:12:amd64 >>> FreeBSD:12:armv6 >>> FreeBSD:12:armv7 >>> FreeBSD:12:i386 >>> FreeBSD:13:aarch64 >>> FreeBSD:13:amd64 >>> FreeBSD:13:armv6 >>> FreeBSD:13:armv7 >>> FreeBSD:13:i386 >>> FreeBSD:13:powerpc >>> FreeBSD:13:powerpc64 >>> FreeBSD:13:powerpc64le >>> FreeBSD:14:aarch64 >>> FreeBSD:14:amd64 >>> FreeBSD:14:armv6 >>> FreeBSD:14:armv7 >>> FreeBSD:14:i386 >>> FreeBSD:14:powerpc >>> FreeBSD:14:powerpc64 >>> FreeBSD:14:powerpc64le >>> FreeBSD:15:aarch64 >>> FreeBSD:15:amd64 >>> FreeBSD:15:armv6 >>> FreeBSD:15:armv7 >>> FreeBSD:15:i386 >>> FreeBSD:15:powerpc >>> FreeBSD:15:powerpc64 >>> FreeBSD:15:powerpc64le The below is mostly about what I currently see in the packages tables (ABI/latest/quarterly) that I've just looked at. I do not see FreeBSD:15:powerpc64le showing on on FreshPorts yet. But https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:powerpc64le/latest/ is populated with data from 2023-Nov-29 (as shown in my web browser) and the above list shows FreeBSD:15:powerpc64le . FreeBSD:14:powerpc64le and FreeBSD:13:powerpc64le are similar but the more up to date data are in (2023-Dec dates): https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:powerpc64le/quarterly/ and: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:13:powerpc64le/quarterly/ ( as documented on https://pkg.freebsd.org/ ). FreeBSD:14:powerpc and FreeBSD:13:powerpc (32-bit powerpc) are similar but the more up to date data are in (2023-Dec and 2023-Nov dates): https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:14:powerpc/quarterly/ and: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:13:powerpc/quarterly/ ( as documented on https://pkg.freebsd.org/ ). By contrast, FreeBSD:15:powerpc has no data in: https://pkg.freebsd.org/FreeBSD:15:powerpc/latest/ so its not showing may be as expected. (Not documented on https://pkg.freebsd.org/ as being empty.) The various FreeBSD:*:mips64 still show up (version numbers being "-") but are not in the list above. There are also FreeBSD:12:mips , FreeBSD:13:mips , and FreeBSD:14:mips (32-bit mips) showing (version numbers being "-"). (No 32 bit mips shown for FreeBSD:15:* .) I also see odd popup status results for some cells with version numbers showing. Take, for example, devel/llvm17: FreeBSD:15:powerpc64 two "17.0.1" entries have popups that report: QUOTE repo not found never imported 2023-12-1-0 23:00 - last checked by FreshPorts END QUOTE I'd expect that sort of thing for the version number being just "-" but there is a version number showing. I'm not sure if some of this might be expected or not. >>> >>> There might be issues at times with https://pkg.freebsd.org/index.html not >>> being in sync. As far as I can tell, that page is manually maintained. >>> >>> Hopefully this can help. >> >> I think it's fantastic. I've added it to https://github.com/FreshPorts/freshports/issues/505 >> >>> I've no clue about the id column as the list changes, for example >>> when the FreeBSD:12:* disappear sometime after the end of the year. >> >> No worries about database issues. Those I can resolve. It's what you did that I can't often find an easy solution. > . . . === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com