Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 19:01:56 UTC 
--------
Marek Zarychta writes:

> Thanks for heads up. Unfortunately, it will be a great loss. The waste 
> of power resources might increase since vt(4) still doesn't support VESA 
> Display Power Management Signaling [...]

But the operative word there is "still", isn't it ?

There is nothing which prevents vt(4) from doing the right thing is there ?


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.