Re: What to do about tgammal?
- In reply to: Steve Kargl : "Re: What to do about tgammal?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 14:40:52 UTC
Le 21.12.2021 08:47, Steve Kargl a écrit : > Not at the moment. tlibm only handles math functions with > a single real agrument [1]. I've been thinking about adding > the 2 argument functions such as atan2 and complex argument > function, but lack the time. I also need to improve the man > page to decoment the default domain for each function and its > complete domain. > > [1] acos, acosh, asin, asinh, atan, atanh, cbrt, cos, cosh, erf, > erfc, exp, exp2, expm1, j0, j1, lgamma, log, log10, log1p, > log2, sin, sinh, sqrt, tan, tanh, tgamma, y0, y1. > No problem. It's a great project. Keep up posting about your progress. -- Marc