Re: What to do about tgammal?
- Reply: Marc Fonvieille : "Re: What to do about tgammal?"
- In reply to: Marc Fonvieille : "Re: What to do about tgammal?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 16:47:49 UTC
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 03:46:40PM +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > Le 20.12.2021 16:48, Steve Kargl a écrit : > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:15:53AM +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > > > > > I assume what Steve is talking about is the corresponding value in > > > decimal of the number of ULP. > > > > > > > Bad assumption. Please read Goldberg's paper. I am talking > > about ULP in the underlying floating point format. > > > > Thanks, it's more clear now: it's the ULP value. > Is your tlibm_libm program available for testing ? If I find time I'd like to > do some tests. > Not at the moment. tlibm only handles math functions with a single real agrument [1]. I've been thinking about adding the 2 argument functions such as atan2 and complex argument function, but lack the time. I also need to improve the man page to decoment the default domain for each function and its complete domain. [1] acos, acosh, asin, asinh, atan, atanh, cbrt, cos, cosh, erf, erfc, exp, exp2, expm1, j0, j1, lgamma, log, log10, log1p, log2, sin, sinh, sqrt, tan, tanh, tgamma, y0, y1. -- Steve