Re: ZFS on a shared iSCSI
- In reply to: Julien Cigar : "Re: Re: ZFS on a shared iSCSI"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 15:19:44 UTC
07.02.24 16:24, Julien Cigar: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:12:21PM +0200, Oleksandr Kryvulia wrote: >> 07.02.24 14:24, Julien Cigar: >>> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:55:54AM +0100, Andrea Brancatelli wrote: >>>> Hello guys, I'm not 100% this is the correct list to ask this question, if >>>> not please feel free to point me in the right direction. >>>> >>>> I was wondering what could be the best recipe to have an HA cluster sharing >>>> an external ZFS storage. >>>> >>>> Let's say I have two servers running a bunch of Jails and, thus, I'd like >>>> to use ZFS as the underlying storage layer and I have an external (iSCSI) >>>> storage connected. >>>> >>>> Would it be "easily possible" to have some (2?) iSCSI LUN exposed to both >>>> servers and then activate the pool on one or the other server? >>>> >>>> The idea would be to reactivate the filesystem from server A on server B if >>>> the server A fails. >>>> >>>> Would it be "easier" to replicate everything and zfs send datas back and >>>> forth? Clearly that would mean doubling datas and havin a scheduled replica >>>> with a possible delay in data replication, so I'd like to avoid this. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? >>> I asked something similar a few years ago, the whole thread may be an interesting >>> read: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2016-June/023456.html >>> >>> Just to say that I tried a lot of different things, and came up to the >>> conclusion that for critical production usage all those things are >>> fragile and with hidden dragons everywhere. >>> >>> I love FreeBSD (I use it exclusively everywhere, also at work), but >>> there aren't any supported open-source solution for something like an >>> "highly available ZFS cluster". On the commercial side there is RSF-1 >>> and beasts like Pure storage ($$$) but ... >>> >>> I would really like to see CEPH ported to FreeBSD, that would be >>> extremely useful >> What about www/minio? Does anyone have any experience of production use? We >> have a lot of bhyve vm's backened by local zfs storage, but I am interesting >> in some kind of hyperconverged solution. > I'm not sure Minio offers block storage..? No, but maybe md(4) can be used if needed. For bhyve vm's in my case we can move from zvol to img files.