Re: Re: ZFS on a shared iSCSI
- Reply: Oleksandr Kryvulia : "Re: ZFS on a shared iSCSI"
- In reply to: Oleksandr Kryvulia : "Re: ZFS on a shared iSCSI"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 14:24:32 UTC
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:12:21PM +0200, Oleksandr Kryvulia wrote: > 07.02.24 14:24, Julien Cigar: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:55:54AM +0100, Andrea Brancatelli wrote: > > > Hello guys, I'm not 100% this is the correct list to ask this question, if > > > not please feel free to point me in the right direction. > > > > > > I was wondering what could be the best recipe to have an HA cluster sharing > > > an external ZFS storage. > > > > > > Let's say I have two servers running a bunch of Jails and, thus, I'd like > > > to use ZFS as the underlying storage layer and I have an external (iSCSI) > > > storage connected. > > > > > > Would it be "easily possible" to have some (2?) iSCSI LUN exposed to both > > > servers and then activate the pool on one or the other server? > > > > > > The idea would be to reactivate the filesystem from server A on server B if > > > the server A fails. > > > > > > Would it be "easier" to replicate everything and zfs send datas back and > > > forth? Clearly that would mean doubling datas and havin a scheduled replica > > > with a possible delay in data replication, so I'd like to avoid this. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > I asked something similar a few years ago, the whole thread may be an interesting > > read: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2016-June/023456.html > > > > Just to say that I tried a lot of different things, and came up to the > > conclusion that for critical production usage all those things are > > fragile and with hidden dragons everywhere. > > > > I love FreeBSD (I use it exclusively everywhere, also at work), but > > there aren't any supported open-source solution for something like an > > "highly available ZFS cluster". On the commercial side there is RSF-1 > > and beasts like Pure storage ($$$) but ... > > > > I would really like to see CEPH ported to FreeBSD, that would be > > extremely useful > > What about www/minio? Does anyone have any experience of production use? We > have a lot of bhyve vm's backened by local zfs storage, but I am interesting > in some kind of hyperconverged solution. I'm not sure Minio offers block storage..? > -- Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.