Re: Difference in "netstat -rn" output in the last 2 months
- Reply: Sulev-Madis Silber : "Re: Difference in "netstat -rn" output in the last 2 months"
- Reply: Alexey Dokuchaev : "Re: Difference in "netstat -rn" output in the last 2 months"
- In reply to: Alexander Leidinger : "Difference in "netstat -rn" output in the last 2 months"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:46:04 UTC
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 04:58:57PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: A> something has changed in the output of "netstat -rn" between A> 2024-11-23-195545 and 2025-01-22-151306. The default route is not listed as A> "default" anymore, but with "0.0.0.0" resp. "::/0". This breaks some tools A> (e.g. iocage). Iocage uses python, I'm not sure if it uses netstat or some A> other interface, so it may not be directly related to netstat itself but A> could be related to some other stuff (netlink maybe?). A> A> Does this ring a bell for someone? This is very likely changed by 9206c79961986c2114a9a2cfccf009ac010ad259. Allan, may be make exclusion for the "default" to keep POLA? Otherwise, indeed at time of 15.0-RELEASE we will receive some negative feedback :) Maybe double -nn should introduce new behavior? -- Gleb Smirnoff