Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:06:21 UTC
Hi, The documentation project on reviews.freebsd.org is also very inactive. For example, it's been almost 3 months since I submitted my revision - https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37322. After I submitted it, it was neither reviewed nor approved for a long time. Now, due to changes in the FreeBSD documentation, some of my changes conflict with the current documentation and are difficult to resolve. I suppose I could spend some time going over it again and again, but if no one accepts it, it is pointless. Maybe I shouldn't make such extensive changes to the documentation.Can you advise me on how I should go about doing this? Thanks a lot. ykla Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> 于2023年1月30日周一 18:33写道: > Hello, > > > I had a similar thing happen to me, the mailing list FreeBSD-doc seemed > to > > exist as if no one existed, and there was no one posting in it except for > > the automated bug reports from the bots. > > I have not had any replies to my several posts either. > > > So can the admins tell how many people actually > > subscribe to FreeBSD-doc, > > The list has 496 subscribers right now. (speaking as one of postmaster@). > > > or is this just a place to report bugs and people > > should discuss FreeBSD doc-related issues elsewhere? Or is it that almost > > nobody cares about the FreeBSD documentation? > > From my observation, the last few month led to a huge pile of > workload on many folks that are involved with FreeBSD stuff, so > not many folks had time to reply/think things through/answer. > I had the same problem... > > I see doc-stuff happen mostly on reviews.freebsd.org. (speaking > as one of phabric-admins). Pau Amma is the most active docs-person > as far as I can see. I have not calculated stats, just my gut feeling. > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? > >