Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)
- Reply: Patrick M. Hausen: "Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)"
- In reply to: Patrick M. Hausen: "Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:45:09 UTC
Quoting "Patrick M. Hausen" <pmh@hausen.com> (from Wed, 9 Nov 2022 20:02:55 +0100): > Hi all, > >> Am 09.11.2022 um 16:54 schrieb Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>: >> >> There is a fixed list of features we support in the boot loader: >> >> [...] >> >> Any feature not on this list will cause the boot loader to >> >> reject the pool. > > I admit that I do not grasp the full implications of this thread and > the proposed > and debated changes. Does that imply that a simple "zpool upgrade" of the > boot/root pool might lead to an unbootable system in the future - even if the > boot loader is upgraded as it should, too? For a recent pool (zpool get all rpool | grep -q feature && echo recent enough): no. But "zpool set feature@edonr=enabled rpool" (or any other feature not in the list we talk about) would render it unbootable. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander@Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild@FreeBSD.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF