Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)
- Reply: Alexander Leidinger : "Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)"
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)"
- Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)"
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: changes to the zfs boot (was: Re: git: 72a1cb05cd23 - main - rc(8): Add a zpoolupgrade rc.d script)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:02:55 UTC
Hi all, > Am 09.11.2022 um 16:54 schrieb Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>: > >> There is a fixed list of features we support in the boot loader: > >> [...] > >> Any feature not on this list will cause the boot loader to > >> reject the pool. I admit that I do not grasp the full implications of this thread and the proposed and debated changes. Does that imply that a simple "zpool upgrade" of the boot/root pool might lead to an unbootable system in the future - even if the boot loader is upgraded as it should, too? Kind regards, thanks for some insight, Patrick