[Bug 276985] crash in LinuxKPI/drm

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=276985

--- Comment #33 from feh@fehcom.de ---
Hi,

> My last question - if you are the drm module maintainer / developer - would it be 
> possible to mark following ports with incremental numbers like 510, 515, 610, not 61 
> for a newest release please (61 < 515)?

AFAIK those numbers come from the Linux development. The AMD people build their
drivers here and those numbers are related to the Kernel version:

5.15 => Linux Kernel 5.15
6.1 => Linux Kernel 6.1 (6.10 is current)

It would not be a good idea to setup a new/different nameing scheme. As a
developer/maintainer/porter I would rather stay close to upstream.

--eh. 

PS: Linus doesn't follow Semantic Versioning strictly, thus there is no real
breaking difference between the 5.x and 6.y branch. This may change with Rust
in the kernel, but this is a different story.

PPS: So far, the new DRM seems to work well.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.