From nobody Tue Sep 03 11:56:17 2024 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Wykc20kfDz5MsWj for ; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 11:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wykc16qM7z4RL9 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725364578; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=p5DN+NyRjy4f6ME0hJjLcvo8bGSjE/j6Jokmau9HcRB8dzUL8yygb0d5yKuz9n1E1dAIGS R7n1Ve9OV42s/RkJg+s6bZ8b4wnnTW+/88ZWPPoU5KqY8mqt+8hwa+o5ESuamNjvvr7isM B01ulTzw71+toC0NLZ3SzIMluY9v5cf77oirOSWTjprhYiVlWy6+Nw3bVxox819to4hLse gfJAPYcDpzLLjJ+5/wfy1DVENbNd5ZqKl9jQqf92qvO7fQFadcGbGDJkQ24mGJTt2febUk yXmvRcFIzqoxoIVTiGeAqhg68Pb2WQOOny/Ze3q6RoPL31/nC+0ijRoeEBdFYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725364578; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/8mhL+n6gb58QyMueTSBPlre1aPczZ+sRVrqxJAhfq4=; b=FEzW3qTBbjLfGN3tB9mZTG1rqAEFHZsfN4obO131mkiPdpJWYSc1jxDH/DP/bUD9dH80RF Q2OqCQGrDgGP2LugDOfCvrsRv3+qmTuIgcWZkqPXCw+hw9VNmuOATlDElHH1NujWtpgQtO qtPcCLrig4P9Nwkpr8KReXB+66pusbCFkn/TDuxYUCZaa1po/94Fcy2JzOOcdYgRQI5V6V nI9syR46HmYjVf26nVm3JTxsv+7E8ZLVAKNJ1I9ahun2ALkm8Eq1vhroc8GC0F5srOSkHH 3eiAsqFcT1V3sWfUOXF2tbqrJ5swmaoC8+Oeq6+CawdAJ1TKJMx6bs3xZeVIIg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wykc16QsxzgD1 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:56:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 483BuH0c084486 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:56:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 483BuHW5084484 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 11:56:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276985] crash in LinuxKPI/drm Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 11:56:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: feh@fehcom.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable14? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276985 --- Comment #33 from feh@fehcom.de --- Hi, > My last question - if you are the drm module maintainer / developer - wou= ld it be=20 > possible to mark following ports with incremental numbers like 510, 515, = 610, not 61=20 > for a newest release please (61 < 515)? AFAIK those numbers come from the Linux development. The AMD people build t= heir drivers here and those numbers are related to the Kernel version: 5.15 =3D> Linux Kernel 5.15 6.1 =3D> Linux Kernel 6.1 (6.10 is current) It would not be a good idea to setup a new/different nameing scheme. As a developer/maintainer/porter I would rather stay close to upstream. --eh.=20 PS: Linus doesn't follow Semantic Versioning strictly, thus there is no real breaking difference between the 5.x and 6.y branch. This may change with Ru= st in the kernel, but this is a different story. PPS: So far, the new DRM seems to work well. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=