Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 21:37:59 UTC
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 02:26:19PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On Oct 27, 2023, at 11:28, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:35:39PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000308.html > >> [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231019 fb7140b1f928)] > >> > >> reported (note "RPI"): > >> > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 RPI > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 > >> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC > >> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD > >> > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000310.html > >> [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231026 d3a36e4b7459) ] > >> > >> reported (note "PINE64" without "-LTS" and lack of "RPI"): > >> > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64 > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 > >> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 > >> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC > >> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD > >> > >> > > > > Last week, RPI succeeded while PINE64 failed. This week, the opposite > > occurred. > > I should have looked at more history instead of just using the 2. Sorry. > No worries at all. It is a valid inquiry - especially since I honestly was expecting another PINE64 failure this week. Glen