Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)

Reply: Glen Barber : "Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)"
In reply to: Glen Barber : "Re: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too)"
Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]

From: Mark Millard <marklmi_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 21:26:19 UTC

On Oct 27, 2023, at 11:28, Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:35:39PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000308.html
>> [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231019 fb7140b1f928)]
>> 
>> reported (note "RPI"):
>> 
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 RPI
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64
>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC
>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD
>> 
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000310.html
>> [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231026 d3a36e4b7459) ]
>> 
>> reported (note "PINE64" without "-LTS" and lack of "RPI"):
>> 
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64
>> o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64
>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC
>> o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD
>> 
>> 
> 
> Last week, RPI succeeded while PINE64 failed.  This week, the opposite
> occurred.

I should have looked at more history instead of just using the 2. Sorry.


===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com