Re: ALPHA1 on Raspberry Pi 3B+ [added: and RPi4B]
- Reply: Emmanuel Vadot : "Re: ALPHA1 on Raspberry Pi 3B+ [added: and RPi4B]"
- In reply to: Mike Karels : "Re: ALPHA1 on Raspberry Pi 3B+ [added: and RPi4B]"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:44:13 UTC
can’t we OF_setprop some bogus string in the compatible property after the first failure so it won’t come back at every bus scan > On 14 Aug 2023, at 20:44, Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote: > > On 14 Aug 2023, at 11:19, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > >> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:55:39 -0500 >> Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote: >> >>> On 14 Aug 2023, at 10:44, titus wrote: >>> >>>> + if (OF_hasprop(ofw_bus_get_node(dev), "clock-frequency") == 0) { >>>> + device_printf(dev, "clock-fixed have no clock-frequency\n"); >>>> + return (ENXIO); >>>> + } >>>> this runs before compat_data is checked so will print it for any device clock or not >> >> Meh, that's why I should do code at 7am :) >> >>> Good point! Shuffling a bit to check both, I see 58 occurrences >>> of the message. That's better than the 50+ 3-line sequences before. >>> >>> Mike >> >> Is that more or less than the previous message ? If it's the same >> there is no point to commit this. > > It's the same number of occurrences, but before there were 3 lines per > occurrence. Now it's 1, and it's more clear what it means. I'd say > it's worth it. > > Mike > >>>>> On Aug 14, 2023, at 6:07 PM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:51:27 -0500 >>>>> Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 14 Aug 2023, at 0:30, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 07:03:19 +0200 >>>>>>> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:35:31 -0500 >>>>>>>> Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 13 Aug 2023, at 12:19, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:25:25 -0500 >>>>>>>>>> Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 13 Aug 2023, at 11:10, Mark Millard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 13, 2023, at 08:17, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Manu just updated Linux DTS in the tree. Maybe see if you revert that if the problem persists. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> git: 69f8cc60aa1e - main - ofw_firmware: Only match if there is no compatible >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> is the fix that Manu has committed: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> QUOTE >>>>>>>>>>>> ofw_firmware: Only match if there is no compatible >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If there is a compatible string it likely means that the firmware needs >>>>>>>>>>>> a dedicated driver (like on RPI*). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> PR: 273087 >>>>>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG >>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes: fdfd3a90b6ce ("ofw: Add a ofw_firmware driver") >>>>>>>>>>>> END QUOTE >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just for completeness: that change fixes the bcm2835_cpufreq0/powerd >>>>>>>>>>> problem and the gpioled0 problem, but not the clk_fixed2 problem >>>>>>>>>>> (clk_fixed4 on rpi4). Installing an msdos boot partition from the >>>>>>>>>>> 3 Aug image makes that problem disappear. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There is two fixed-clock in the DTB without clock-frequency property >>>>>>>>>> and with a status set to "disabled", this isn't conforming to the >>>>>>>>>> bindings >>>>>>>>>> (https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/contrib/device-tree/Bindings/clock/fixed-clock.yaml) >>>>>>>>>> so we complain on this, this is normal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would it be possible to detect the disabled status to prevent the errors >>>>>>>>> (I'm guessing not) or to suppress the repeats? 150 lines of errors seems >>>>>>>>> like a lot for an out-of-spec DTB entry, and makes it hard to ignore. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Detecting the disabled status makes no sense, a fixed clock cannot be >>>>>>>> disable, it's always present and running. >>>>>>>> But I think that if we check that clock-frenquency isn't present in >>>>>>>> the probe function, print a message and bail we will not attempt to >>>>>>>> attach the driver at each pass. >>>>>>>> That's the only clean solution that I can see without making dirty >>>>>>>> hacks for some non-conforming DTB. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Something like this : >>>>>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~manu/0001-clk-fixed-Bail-early-if-there-is-no-clock-frequency-.patch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know if that works. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not exactly. This results in: >>>>>> >>>>>> clk_fixed4: clock-fixed have no clock-frequency >>>>>> >>>>>> but this appears 1562 times. btw, "have" should be "has". >>>>> >>>>> Then I don't know how to fix this properly. >>>>> >>>>>> I hadn't noticed them before, but there are a lock order reversal >>>>>> and a malloc while holding a non-sleepable lock, associated with >>>>>> the gpio fix: >>>>> >>>>> Are you sure that they are new ? >>>>> >>>>>> gpioled0: <GPIO LEDs> on ofwbus0 >>>>>> lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable) >>>>>> 1st 0xffff000000d0f6f8 LED mtx (LED mtx, sleep mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:298 >>>>>> 2nd 0xffffa00001857c10 Raspberry Pi firmware gpio (Raspberry Pi firmware gpio, sx) @ /usr/src/sys/arm/broadcom/bcm2835/raspberrypi_gpio.c:252 >>>>>> lock order LED mtx -> Raspberry Pi firmware gpio attempted at: >>>>>> #0 0xffff0000004d3984 at witness_checkorder+0xa98 >>>>>> #1 0xffff00000046ecb4 at _sx_xlock+0x7c >>>>>> #2 0xffff0000008b1700 at rpi_fw_gpio_pin_set+0xe0 >>>>>> #3 0xffff0000001c7400 at led_create_state+0x158 >>>>>> #4 0xffff0000001910d4 at gpioled_attach+0x290 >>>>>> #5 0xffff00000049efa4 at device_attach+0x3f8 >>>>>> #6 0xffff00000049eb14 at device_probe_and_attach+0x7c >>>>>> #7 0xffff0000004a0e54 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xfc >>>>>> #8 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac >>>>>> #9 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac >>>>>> #10 0xffff00000049bd30 at bus_set_pass+0x4c >>>>>> #11 0xffff0000003ea3bc at mi_startup+0x1fc >>>>>> #12 0xffff0000000008ac at virtdone+0x70 >>>>>> uma_zalloc_debug: zone "malloc-64" with the following non-sleepable locks held: >>>>>> exclusive sleep mutex LED mtx (LED mtx) r = 0 (0xffff000000d0f6f8) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:298 >>>>>> stack backtrace: >>>>>> #0 0xffff0000004d3dc8 at witness_debugger+0x5c >>>>>> #1 0xffff0000004d4fcc at witness_warn+0x400 >>>>>> #2 0xffff0000007830a0 at uma_zalloc_debug+0x30 >>>>>> #3 0xffff000000782c20 at uma_zalloc_arg+0x2c >>>>>> #4 0xffff000000437abc at malloc+0x8c >>>>>> #5 0xffff0000008a69b4 at bcm2835_firmware_property+0x44 >>>>>> #6 0xffff0000008b1718 at rpi_fw_gpio_pin_set+0xf8 >>>>>> #7 0xffff0000001c7400 at led_create_state+0x158 >>>>>> #8 0xffff0000001910d4 at gpioled_attach+0x290 >>>>>> #9 0xffff00000049efa4 at device_attach+0x3f8 >>>>>> #10 0xffff00000049eb14 at device_probe_and_attach+0x7c >>>>>> #11 0xffff0000004a0e54 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xfc >>>>>> #12 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac >>>>>> #13 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac >>>>>> #14 0xffff00000049bd30 at bus_set_pass+0x4c >>>>>> #15 0xffff0000003ea3bc at mi_startup+0x1fc >>>>>> #16 0xffff0000000008ac at virtdone+0x70 >>>>>> uma_zalloc_debug: zone "malloc-16" with the following non-sleepable locks held: >>>>>> exclusive sleep mutex LED mtx (LED mtx) r = 0 (0xffff000000d0f6f8) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:298 >>>>>> stack backtrace: >>>>>> #0 0xffff0000004d3dc8 at witness_debugger+0x5c >>>>>> #1 0xffff0000004d4fcc at witness_warn+0x400 >>>>>> #2 0xffff0000007830a0 at uma_zalloc_debug+0x30 >>>>>> #3 0xffff000000782c20 at uma_zalloc_arg+0x2c >>>>>> #4 0xffff000000437abc at malloc+0x8c >>>>>> #5 0xffff0000007ce15c at bounce_bus_dmamem_alloc+0x50 >>>>>> #6 0xffff0000008a9404 at bcm2835_mbox_property+0xdc >>>>>> #7 0xffff0000008a69e8 at bcm2835_firmware_property+0x78 >>>>>> #8 0xffff0000008b1718 at rpi_fw_gpio_pin_set+0xf8 >>>>>> #9 0xffff0000001c7400 at led_create_state+0x158 >>>>>> #10 0xffff0000001910d4 at gpioled_attach+0x290 >>>>>> #11 0xffff00000049efa4 at device_attach+0x3f8 >>>>>> #12 0xffff00000049eb14 at device_probe_and_attach+0x7c >>>>>> #13 0xffff0000004a0e54 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xfc >>>>>> #14 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac >>>>>> #15 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac >>>>>> #16 0xffff00000049bd30 at bus_set_pass+0x4c >>>>>> #17 0xffff0000003ea3bc at mi_startup+0x1fc >>>>>> uma_zalloc_debug: zone "malloc-128" with the following non-sleepable locks held: >>>>>> exclusive sleep mutex LED mtx (LED mtx) r = 0 (0xffff000000d0f6f8) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:298 >>>>>> stack backtrace: >>>>>> #0 0xffff0000004d3dc8 at witness_debugger+0x5c >>>>>> #1 0xffff0000004d4fcc at witness_warn+0x400 >>>>>> #2 0xffff0000007830a0 at uma_zalloc_debug+0x30 >>>>>> #3 0xffff000000782c20 at uma_zalloc_arg+0x2c >>>>>> #4 0xffff000000437abc at malloc+0x8c >>>>>> #5 0xffff0000007ce1ac at bounce_bus_dmamem_alloc+0xa0 >>>>>> #6 0xffff0000008a9404 at bcm2835_mbox_property+0xdc >>>>>> #7 0xffff0000008a69e8 at bcm2835_firmware_property+0x78 >>>>>> #8 0xffff0000008b1718 at rpi_fw_gpio_pin_set+0xf8 >>>>>> #9 0xffff0000001c7400 at led_create_state+0x158 >>>>>> #10 0xffff0000001910d4 at gpioled_attach+0x290 >>>>>> #11 0xffff00000049efa4 at device_attach+0x3f8 >>>>>> #12 0xffff00000049eb14 at device_probe_and_attach+0x7c >>>>>> #13 0xffff0000004a0e54 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xfc >>>>>> #14 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac >>>>>> #15 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac >>>>>> #16 0xffff00000049bd30 at bus_set_pass+0x4c >>>>>> #17 0xffff0000003ea3bc at mi_startup+0x1fc >>>>>> >>>>>> Mike >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org> >>>>> >> >> >> -- >> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>