Re: sys/modules/Makefile and MACHINE_ARCH vs arm64 (in use) vs aarch64 (not in use) VS. man arch; also COMPAT_FREEBSD32_ENABLED use
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: sys/modules/Makefile and MACHINE_ARCH vs arm64 (in use) vs aarch64 (not in use) VS. man arch; also COMPAT_FREEBSD32_ENABLED use"
- In reply to: Warner Losh : "Re: sys/modules/Makefile and MACHINE_ARCH vs arm64 (in use) vs aarch64 (not in use) VS. man arch; also COMPAT_FREEBSD32_ENABLED use"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 19:56:42 UTC
On Aug 2, 2023, at 11:16, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > Those all look wrong to me. > > Warner > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 11:27 AM Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > man arch reports: > > MACHINE MACHINE_CPUARCH MACHINE_ARCH > arm64 aarch64 aarch64 > . . . > arm arm armv6, armv7 > > So I'd not expect arm64 in MACHINE_ARCH . But > sys/modules/Makefile has (from a grep for MACHINE_ARCH): > > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "arm64" > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "arm64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH:Mpowerpc64*} > > > Another issue may be that COMPAT_FREEBSD32_ENABLED is only > put to use in the Makefile for MACHINE_CPUARCH being i386 > or amd64 : > > .if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "i386" || ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "amd64" > _agp= agp > .if ${MACHINE_CPUARCH} == "i386" || !empty(COMPAT_FREEBSD32_ENABLED) > . . . I'll note that, for example, i386 vs. armv7 do not match for some struct md_ioctl field offsets and the overall size. Mike Karels is looking at getting struct md_ioctl32 correctly matching each of of the contexts: i386, (32-bit) powerpc, and armv7. I do not know if there are other COMPAT_FREEBSD32 adjustments needed for differences in memory layout across the 3 (i386, powerpc, armv7). md_ioctl I learned about via kyua test runs and looking at the background for some things it reported for armv7. I've not found a clear indication of what is expected to work for chroot/lib32 vs. what is not expected to work. It seems one must look in the code and see if one finds conditional material based, in part, on COMPAT_FREEBSD32. It might also be that COMPAT_FREEBSD32 for i386 vs. armv7 vs. powerpc might not be intending identical coverage for all I know. So seeing COMPAT_FREEBSD32 might not be enough to know the intent. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com