Re: Oversimplification
- In reply to: Milan Obuch : "Re: Oversimplification"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:34:58 UTC
On 6/2/21 7:13 AM, Milan Obuch wrote: > On Sun, 30 May 2021 17:49:01 -0400, George Mitchell > <george+freebsd@m5p.com> wrote: > >> I've never been shy about oversimplifying complex questions, so here >> goes: What's the ARM system that presents the least hassle to a >> prospective FreeBSD user? Here's what I mean by low hassle: >> >> 1. Widely available. >> 2. Runs some standard FreeBSD image with minimal (or no) tweaking. >> 3. I suspect ARM64 means less hassle than ARM32. >> 4. Friendly to an external high-speed (at least USB 3; possibly SATA?) >> disk. >> 5. Hopefully 8GB on-board memory, though 4GB is probably okay if high >> speed swapping is available (see point 4). >> 6. Affordable, but not cheap. >> >> And next on my Santa list ... -- George >> > > Did you consider RockPro64 from pine64.com? Two models are available, > with 2 GB RAM and 4 GB RAM. There is PCIe x4 slot, USB ports (3.0 and > 2.0, four total), so your prerequisites are probably met. Also, you can > download FreeBSD-13.0-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-ROCKPRO64.img.xz from > FreeBSD ftp site and start. > > I could test it in past for some days and it worked. I did not have > opportunity to test what could be connected to PCIe slot, but from the > same vendor some cards could be had as well - dual SATA-II or M.2/NGFF > interface card. > > Just one a bit odd detail using stock image - console line speed was > 1.5 Mb/s. I spent some time figuring this. 4 GB version currently out > of stock, unfortunately. > > They are preparing Quartz64 card, up to 8 GB RAM, no ETA yet. > > Regards, > Milan > Thanks for the response! -- George