Re: git: ea45a9a53499 - main - cad/PrusaSlicer: Mark BROKEN

Le jeu.  7 mars 24 à 15:15:30 +0100, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
 écrivait :

> > My main point is this. We should mark ports as BROKEN when *they* are
> > broken, not when the dependencies are.
> 
> In this case, the dependency was not broken in the sense that it built
> just fine.
> We mark ports BROKEN because they don't build, so that the FreeBSD ports
> infrastructure does not spend hours trying to build stuff that will
> never build.

Yes, in this case, it would be rather IGNORE and not BROKEN, but
Fernando is right: the faulty port should be marked, not its consumers.
And the compilation farm will not even try to build them.

But yet better: I would prefer that the committer who pushed this commit
be notified, and that without a prompt reaction on his part, it be
reverted.
-- 
Th. Thomas.