kern/178467: [request] Optimized Checksum Code for ZFS
Jason Keller
jkeller at bbiinternational.com
Fri May 10 14:40:04 UTC 2013
The following reply was made to PR kern/178467; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Keller <jkeller at bbiinternational.com>
To: Steven Hartland <smh at freebsd.org>, "bug-followup at freebsd.org"
<bug-followup at freebsd.org>
Cc:
Subject: RE: kern/178467: [request] Optimized Checksum Code for ZFS
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:35:10 +0000
I'll gather some numbers together comparing OmniOS (Illumos) vs FreeBSD and=
get back some numbers for you. I can use my Xeon E3-1240 at home for the =
benchmarking, it'll just take me some time to gather everything together to=
do it. Are there any specific tools you'd like me to run, or just basic z=
pool iostat and mpstat / top -P ?
JASON KELLER, CCNA | IT MANAGER | BBI INTERNATIONAL
B: +1 701 738 4910 | :: +1 701 426 6240 | :: jkeller at bbiinternational.com
j: Mon-Thu 0730-1130 & 1230-1700 UTC-5 and Fri 0730-1000 UTC-5
Like the job I did? Recommend me on LinkedIn > =20
ETHANOL PRODUCER MAGAZINE | BIODIESEL MAGAZINE | BIOMASS MAGAZINE | THE BAK=
KEN MAGAZINE
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Hartland [mailto:smh at freebsd.org]=20
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:29 AM
To: bug-followup at freebsd.org; Jason Keller
Subject: Re: kern/178467: [request] Optimized Checksum Code for ZFS
Actually after double checking it looks like FreeBSD doesn't use the same S=
HA-256 implementation in ZFS as illumos so there may well be something to l=
ook at there.
Would be good to know the difference in performance between FreeBSD and Ope=
nindiana (illumos distribution).
Regards
Steve
More information about the zfs-devel
mailing list