kern/178467: [request] Optimized Checksum Code for ZFS

Jason Keller jkeller at bbiinternational.com
Fri May 10 14:40:04 UTC 2013


The following reply was made to PR kern/178467; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Keller <jkeller at bbiinternational.com>
To: Steven Hartland <smh at freebsd.org>, "bug-followup at freebsd.org"
	<bug-followup at freebsd.org>
Cc:  
Subject: RE: kern/178467: [request] Optimized Checksum Code for ZFS
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:35:10 +0000

 I'll gather some numbers together comparing OmniOS (Illumos) vs FreeBSD and=
  get back some numbers for you.  I can use my Xeon E3-1240 at home for the =
 benchmarking, it'll just take me some time to gather everything together to=
  do it.  Are there any specific tools you'd like me to run, or just basic z=
 pool iostat and mpstat / top -P ?
 
 JASON KELLER, CCNA | IT MANAGER | BBI INTERNATIONAL
 
 B: +1 701 738 4910 | :: +1 701 426 6240 | :: jkeller at bbiinternational.com
 j: Mon-Thu 0730-1130 & 1230-1700 UTC-5 and Fri 0730-1000 UTC-5
 Like the job I did?  Recommend me on LinkedIn > =20
 
 ETHANOL PRODUCER MAGAZINE | BIODIESEL MAGAZINE | BIOMASS MAGAZINE | THE BAK=
 KEN MAGAZINE
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Steven Hartland [mailto:smh at freebsd.org]=20
 Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:29 AM
 To: bug-followup at freebsd.org; Jason Keller
 Subject: Re: kern/178467: [request] Optimized Checksum Code for ZFS
 
 Actually after double checking it looks like FreeBSD doesn't use the same S=
 HA-256 implementation in ZFS as illumos so there may well be something to l=
 ook at there.
 
 Would be good to know the difference in performance between FreeBSD and Ope=
 nindiana (illumos distribution).
 
     Regards
     Steve
 
 


More information about the zfs-devel mailing list