The ports move

[Pawel Jakub Dawidek]

On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:05:58PM +0300, Samy Al Bahra wrote:
+> [...] Note that it is a rule of
+> thumb with regards to ports that in order for a new virtual category to
+> be created and new infrastructural changes to be merged in, at-least 7
+> ports must be members of the category.

What's wrong with security/ category?
There could be much more categories, like PAM, for example:

 	# ls -ld /usr/ports/security/pam* | wc -l
 	      11

But I don't really see the point.

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd at FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/trustedbsd-discuss/attachments/20050715/5c4892b5/attachment.bin