PERFORCE change 23431 for review

[Brian F. Feldman]

Robert Watson <rwatson at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Not all synthetic pseudofs file systems might be multilabel; does the
> pseudofs model easily allow individual pseudofs file systems to set the
> mount flags?  If so, that might be a preferred model.

Well, my thought on this matter is that all pseudofs filesystems are free to 
not implement the new associate entry point (like the devfs one) when I 
implement it, and they'll be effectively singlelabel filesystems by getting 
the single from the mount structure.  I may be confused as to whether or not 
this will work, because SEBSD does create "valid" vnode labels without a 
create operation.

-- 
Brian Fundakowski Feldman                           \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\
  <> green at FreeBSD.org  <> bfeldman at tislabs.com      \  The Power to Serve! \
 Opinions expressed are my own.                       \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo at trustedbsd.org
with "unsubscribe trustedbsd-cvs" in the body of the message