svn commit: r300961 - vendor/one-true-awk/dist

Pedro Giffuni pfg at FreeBSD.org
Mon May 30 06:21:23 UTC 2016



On 29/05/2016 13:17, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <574B2EAC.3010908 at FreeBSD.org>, Pedro Giffuni writes:
>>
>>
>> On 29/05/2016 12:37, Cy Schubert wrote:
>>> In message <201605291618.u4TGItNJ024583 at repo.freebsd.org>, "Pedro F.
>>> Giffuni" w
>>> rites:
>>>> Author: pfg
>>>> Date: Sun May 29 16:18:55 2016
>>>> New Revision: 300961
>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300961
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>>     one-true-awk: replace 0 with NULL for pointers
>>>>     
>>>>     Also remove a redundant semicolon.
>>>>     Submitted upstream already.
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>     vendor/one-true-awk/dist/b.c
>>>>     vendor/one-true-awk/dist/lex.c
>>>>     vendor/one-true-awk/dist/maketab.c
>>>>     vendor/one-true-awk/dist/parse.c
>>>>     vendor/one-true-awk/dist/run.c
>>>>     vendor/one-true-awk/dist/tran.c
>>>>
>>> Was this commit and r300962 obtained from the upline or vendor or were
>>> these commits local to FreeBSD only?
>>>
>>>
>> There is no public awk public repository AFAICT, but bwk acknowledged
>> the submission.
>>
>> The change to openresolv was merged to the public repository.
> As they've acknowledged the submissions, can you please tag the new
> versions of awk and openresolve with the correct upstream version numbers,
> please?
>
That's an impossible request as there are no "correct upstream version 
numbers".

In the case of openresolv, I included the repository revision, but 
checksums have
no chronological sense and should be avoided for tags.

In this case using tags for anything other than official releases would 
be a mess.
As stated in our subversion primer (5.4.4):

"Vendor patches should be committed to the vendor branch, and merged 
from there to head. If the patch addresses an issue in a new release 
that is currently being imported, it /must not/ be committed along with 
the new release: the release must be imported and tagged first, then the 
patch can be applied and committed. There is no need to re-tag the 
vendor sources after committing the patch."

Pedro.



More information about the svn-src-vendor mailing list