svn commit: r229304 - stable/9/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add
Ken Smith
kensmith at buffalo.edu
Mon Jan 2 23:50:56 UTC 2012
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 00:25 +0200, Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
> On 02/01/2012 20:42, Ken Smith wrote:
> > Author: kensmith
> > Date: Mon Jan 2 18:42:29 2012
> > New Revision: 229304
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229304
> >
> > Log:
> > The portion of r225757 that added the packages-9.0-release directory
> > was supposed to be MFCed closer to the release but that got missed.
> >
> > Pointy hat: kensmith
> >
> > Modified:
> > stable/9/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/main.c
> >
> > Modified: stable/9/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/main.c
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- stable/9/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/main.c Mon Jan 2 18:06:48 2012 (r229303)
> > +++ stable/9/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/main.c Mon Jan 2 18:42:29 2012 (r229304)
> > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct {
> > { 800000, 800499, "/packages-8.0-release" },
> > { 801000, 801499, "/packages-8.1-release" },
> > { 802000, 802499, "/packages-8.2-release" },
> > + { 900000, 900499, "/packages-9.0-release" },
> > { 300000, 399000, "/packages-3-stable" },
> > { 400000, 499000, "/packages-4-stable" },
> > { 502100, 502128, "/packages-5-current" },
>
> Apologies if I'm getting it wrong, but shouldn't the following be MFCed
> too, as noted in PR 162490?
>
> { 600100, 699000, "/packages-6-stable" },
> { 700100, 799000, "/packages-7-stable" },
> { 800500, 899000, "/packages-8-stable" },
> - { 900000, 999000, "/packages-9-current" },
> + { 900500, 999000, "/packages-9-stable" },
> + { 1000000, 1099000, "/packages-10-current" },
> { 0, 9999999, "/packages-current" },
> { 0, 0, NULL }
> };
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162490
>
> Cheers,
> Luchesar
>
I'll fix up that and a few more things in stable/9 shortly. This commit
was aimed more at the bare minimum needed for releng/9.0. The X.0
releases are always a bit weird when it comes to pieces of what's above.
We usually don't release stable/X from code freeze before the release is
announced, and that's when for example 900500 would get created. I
created it today before the release announcement because we'd released
stable/9 from code freeze earlier than we normally do.
In other words I probably could have done it but it doesn't hurt that I
didn't.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith at buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-9/attachments/20120102/75835976/attachment.pgp
More information about the svn-src-stable-9
mailing list