svn commit: r274921 - projects/routing/sys/net

Alexander V. Chernikov melifaro at FreeBSD.org
Mon Nov 24 10:48:58 UTC 2014


On 24.11.2014 10:51, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 05:47:12PM +0000, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> A> Author: melifaro
> A> Date: Sun Nov 23 17:47:12 2014
> A> New Revision: 274921
> A> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/274921
> A>
> A> Log:
> A>   Finish r274335#2: put RT_LOCK_DESTROY() back.
> A>
> A> Modified:
> A>   projects/routing/sys/net/route.c
> A>
> A> Modified: projects/routing/sys/net/route.c
> A> ==============================================================================
> A> --- projects/routing/sys/net/route.c	Sun Nov 23 17:45:49 2014	(r274920)
> A> +++ projects/routing/sys/net/route.c	Sun Nov 23 17:47:12 2014	(r274921)
> A> @@ -1505,6 +1505,7 @@ rtrequest1_fib(int req, struct rt_addrin
> A>  		if (rn == NULL) {
> A>  			ifa_free(rt->rt_ifa);
> A>  			Free(rt_key(rt));
> A> +			RT_LOCK_DESTROY(rt);
> A>  			uma_zfree(V_rtzone, rt);
> A>  #ifdef FLOWTABLE
> A>  			if (rt0 != NULL)
>
> Don't know about your branch, but in head RT_LOCK_DESTROY is done
> in V_rtzone finit method. So you are going to hit destroying of
Well, since there is no place to do rte accounting, I reverted r262763, 
so there is
no init/fini UMA methods.
> already destroyed mutex.
>
> btw, I see no good reason for virtualizing the zone. (Yep, I did that.) :)
>



More information about the svn-src-projects mailing list