svn commit: r360233 - in head: contrib/jemalloc . . . : This partially breaks a 2-socket 32-bit powerpc (old PowerMac G4) based on head -r360311
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 12 04:33:29 UTC 2020
[Yet another oddity.]
On 2020-Jun-11, at 21:05, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> There is another oddity in the code structure, in
> that if pt was ever NULL the code would misuse the
> NULL before the test for non-NULL is made:
>
> pt = moea_pvo_to_pte(pvo, -1);
> . . .
> old_pte = *pt;
>
> /*
> * If the PVO is in the page table, update that pte as well.
> */
> if (pt != NULL) {
>
> (I'm not claiming that this explains the panic.)
There is another NULL handling oddity that the
64-bit code does not have. I'll show 64
relevant bit code first:
pg = PHYS_TO_VM_PAGE(pvo->pvo_pte.pa & LPTE_RPGN);
. . .
if (. . .&& pg != NULL &&
(pg->a.flags & PGA_EXECUTABLE) == 0 &&
. . .) {
if ((pg->oflags & VPO_UNMANAGED) == 0)
vm_page_aflag_set(pg, PGA_EXECUTABLE);
. . .
}
. . .
if (pg != NULL && . . .) {
refchg |= atomic_readandclear_32(&pg->md.mdpg_attrs);
if (refchg & LPTE_CHG)
vm_page_dirty(pg);
if (refchg & LPTE_REF)
vm_page_aflag_set(pg, PGA_REFERENCED);
}
Note: the 2nd outer-if tests for pg != NULL, just like the
first outer-if above does. It avoids potential abuse-of-NULL
activity.
This is not true of the 32-bit code for "m":
m = PHYS_TO_VM_PAGE(old_pte.pte_lo & PTE_RPGN);
if (. . . && m != NULL &&
(m->a.flags & PGA_EXECUTABLE) == 0 &&
. . .) {
if ((m->oflags & VPO_UNMANAGED) == 0)
vm_page_aflag_set(m, PGA_EXECUTABLE);
moea_syncicache(pvo->pvo_pte.pa & PTE_RPGN,
PAGE_SIZE);
}
. . .
if ((pvo->pvo_vaddr & PVO_MANAGED) &&
(pvo->pvo_pte.prot & VM_PROT_WRITE)) {
refchg = atomic_readandclear_32(&m->md.mdpg_attrs);
if (refchg & PTE_CHG)
vm_page_dirty(m);
if (refchg & PTE_REF)
vm_page_aflag_set(m, PGA_REFERENCED);
}
The &m->md.mdpg_attrs use apparently could be based on m
being NULL because there is no test for m != NULL in the
2nd outer-if. Similarly for the other uses of m in that
code block.
My guess that that the 2nd outer-if should test something
like:
. . .
if (m != NULL &&
(pvo->pvo_vaddr & PVO_MANAGED) &&
(pvo->pvo_pte.prot & VM_PROT_WRITE)) {
. . .
(Presumes that the pre-existing m != NULL tests are
necessary, something that I do not know.)
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)
More information about the svn-src-head
mailing list