svn commit: r368163 - in head: sbin/ifconfig sys/dev/if_wg sys/dev/if_wg/include sys/dev/if_wg/include/crypto sys/dev/if_wg/include/sys sys/dev/if_wg/include/zinc sys/dev/if_wg/module sys/dev/if_wg...

[Matthew Macy]

I worry about the incredible mess of header dependencies that the linuxkpi
is prone to introducing. I’m happy to review any proposed changes to that
effect, but do not feel like it’s important enough to make a priority.


Thanks.

-M

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 08:33 Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net>
wrote:

> On 30 Nov 2020, at 14:53, cglogic wrote:
>
> > So you propose to make it dependent on linuxkpi? What have to do a
> > user who does not compile linuxkpi, but wants to use if_wg?
>
> If we’d move the implementations into linuxkpi you’d have to compile
> it to use if_wg.
> So that this however is only a question.
>
> Effectively you are using parts of linuxkpi now already, just
> copy&pasted (duplicated) into local files under if_wg;  for as much as I
> can see for most of that would however not require linuxkpi to be
> loaded, just present at compile time like any other kernel headers.
>
> /bz
>