svn commit: r334880 - head/sys/dev/vnic

Ian Lepore ian at freebsd.org
Sun Jul 8 15:39:53 UTC 2018


On Sun, 2018-07-08 at 11:26 -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 09:10:27AM -0600, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 07/07/18 11:43, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 02:47:49PM +0000, Andrew Turner wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Author: andrew
> > > > Date: Sat Jun  9 14:47:49 2018
> > > > New Revision: 334880
> > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/334880
> > > > 
> > > > Log:
> > > >   In the ThunderX BGX network driver we were skipping the NULL terminator
> > > >   when parsing the phy type, however this is included in the length returned
> > > >   by OF_getprop. To fix this stop ignoring the terminator.
> > > >   
> > > >   PR:		228828
> > > >   Reported by:	sbruno
> > > >   Sponsored by:	DARPA, AFRL
> > > This seems to break vnic on packet.net ThunderXs.  In particular, VF
> > > creation fails.  It seems the problem in my case is that there are
> > > multiple PHY devices in the device tree, e.g., xfi at 0, xfi at 1.  With this
> > > change, bgx_fdt_phy_name_match() fails to match against any device
> > > containing a unit address in the node name.
> > > 
> > 
> > Huh ... this was *required* to get the ThunderXs we have in the FreeBSD
> > cluster to work at all.  o.0
> > 
> > I guess "someone" needs to contact "someone" to figure out which is
> > correct or we need to replace our FreeBSD cluster machines with ones
> > that work like the packet.net machines?
> I think the current code works fine if there's only one PHY device, so
> my problem is probably just the result of having a different hardware
> setup.  We can probably fix the code to handle both cases.  Could you
> mail me the output of "ofwdump -ap" from the cluster machine?
> 

ofwdump isn't very useful, you'll get much nicer output with:

  sysctl -b hw.fdt.dtb | dtc -I dtb -O dts >somefile.dts

BTW, the whole idea of searching for a phy by walking the node
hierarchy doing string comparisons on node names sounds pretty
antithetical to the whole design of fdt data. Are these nodes not
properly cross-linked with phandles?

-- Ian


More information about the svn-src-head mailing list