svn commit: r304436 - in head: . sys/netinet
Ryan Stone
rysto32 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 20 15:27:26 UTC 2016
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Bruce Simpson <bms at fastmail.net> wrote:
> tun(4) on the other hand is a plain, PPP-like, IP tunnel.
>
Can you send a broadcast packet through an L3 tunnel? I thought that a L2
tunnel was required.
But this mbuf flag is not guaranteed to be set in all situations; e.g.
> where the link layer does not have the concept of broadcast being distinct
> from other kinds of network traffic. PPP and ATM are the most obvious
> examples.
>
We don't support ATM, but PPP is a good example. I hadn't thought of
that. Hm, ip_input() already has to check for a broadcast IP. What it set
M_BCAST on the mbuf at that time?
More information about the svn-src-head
mailing list