svn commit: r330236 - head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src

[Ronald Klop]

On Sun, 04 Mar 2018 02:25:17 +0100, Colin Percival <cperciva at tarsnap.com>  
wrote:

> On 03/01/18 02:31, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> New Revision: 330236
>>   Correct the return value from flush_work() and flush_delayed_work()  
>> in the
>>   LinuxKPI to comply more with Linux. This fixes an issue when these  
>> functions
>>   are used in waiting loops.
>>
>>   MFC after:	1 week
>>   Sponsored by:	Mellanox Technologies
>
> In case the data point is useful: Merging this to stable/11 unbroke S3
> suspend/resume on my laptop (system76 Galago Pro, kabylake, using the
> drm-next-kmod port).
>


These data points are much more useful than commit messages that describe  
what the patch already shows and talk about 'an issue'. Every patch solves  
'an issue' (or creates some :-) ).

No personal pun intended. Just taking this example as general thoughts  
about commit messages.

Regards,
Ronald.