svn commit: r316487 - head/etc

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert at komquats.com> writes:
> This patch caused some boot failures because the contents of rc_force were 
> redefined from "yes" (for yes) and NULL (for no) to the words "yes" and 
> "no". This in turn caused etc/rc.d/dhclient to assume force when $rc_force 
> was not NULL (test -z failed). Interfaces with static IP addresses invoked 
> rc.d/dhclient through devd. The attached patch should make all instances 
> $rc_force consistent with your change.

Yes, I just realized.  I committed the wrong version of the patch.  I
had a version in a different tree which added check_force
etc. functions.

Could you please revert?  I'd like to spend a little more time making
sure I get everything right.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no