svn commit: r301197 - head/sys/dev/xen/netfront

[Roger Pau Monné]

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:19:56PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 06/02/16 13:14, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > +		callout_reset(&rxq->rx_refill, hz/10, xn_alloc_rx_buffers_callout,
> > +		    rxq);
> 
> Maybe use callout_reset_curcpu() to take advantage of callout's SMP
> capabilities ?

Yes, that's fine. But what's the benefit of it? I don't really care whether 
the callout is run on the current CPU or not. Is callout_reset_curcpu 
cheaper than callout_reset?

Roger.