svn commit: r264354 - head/sys/dev/ciss
Sean Bruno
sbruno at FreeBSD.org
Fri Apr 11 20:19:01 UTC 2014
Author: sbruno
Date: Fri Apr 11 20:19:01 2014
New Revision: 264354
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/264354
Log:
Fix insta-panic on assert of unlocked periph mtx in ciss(4) when
logical volume state changes.
Currently, I view this as a critical fix for users and will MFC this rapidly as
my testing has shown data loss when the disk is failed by removing it when
under some amount of write activity and this code panics the box.
Reviewed by: mav@ scottl@
MFC after: 3 days
Sponsored by: Yahoo! Inc.
Modified:
head/sys/dev/ciss/ciss.c
Modified: head/sys/dev/ciss/ciss.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/dev/ciss/ciss.c Fri Apr 11 20:15:53 2014 (r264353)
+++ head/sys/dev/ciss/ciss.c Fri Apr 11 20:19:01 2014 (r264354)
@@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ static int ciss_cam_emulate(struct ciss_
static void ciss_cam_poll(struct cam_sim *sim);
static void ciss_cam_complete(struct ciss_request *cr);
static void ciss_cam_complete_fixup(struct ciss_softc *sc, struct ccb_scsiio *csio);
-static struct cam_periph *ciss_find_periph(struct ciss_softc *sc,
- int bus, int target);
static int ciss_name_device(struct ciss_softc *sc, int bus, int target);
/* periodic status monitoring */
@@ -3413,27 +3411,6 @@ ciss_cam_complete_fixup(struct ciss_soft
/********************************************************************************
- * Find a peripheral attached at (target)
- */
-static struct cam_periph *
-ciss_find_periph(struct ciss_softc *sc, int bus, int target)
-{
- struct cam_periph *periph;
- struct cam_path *path;
- int status;
-
- status = xpt_create_path(&path, NULL, cam_sim_path(sc->ciss_cam_sim[bus]),
- target, 0);
- if (status == CAM_REQ_CMP) {
- periph = cam_periph_find(path, NULL);
- xpt_free_path(path);
- } else {
- periph = NULL;
- }
- return(periph);
-}
-
-/********************************************************************************
* Name the device at (target)
*
* XXX is this strictly correct?
@@ -3442,12 +3419,22 @@ static int
ciss_name_device(struct ciss_softc *sc, int bus, int target)
{
struct cam_periph *periph;
+ struct cam_path *path;
+ int status;
if (CISS_IS_PHYSICAL(bus))
return (0);
- if ((periph = ciss_find_periph(sc, bus, target)) != NULL) {
+
+ status = xpt_create_path(&path, NULL, cam_sim_path(sc->ciss_cam_sim[bus]),
+ target, 0);
+
+ if (status == CAM_REQ_CMP) {
+ xpt_path_lock(path);
+ periph = cam_periph_find(path, NULL);
sprintf(sc->ciss_logical[bus][target].cl_name, "%s%d",
periph->periph_name, periph->unit_number);
+ xpt_path_unlock(path);
+ xpt_free_path(path);
return(0);
}
sc->ciss_logical[bus][target].cl_name[0] = 0;
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list