svn commit: r222795 - head/sys/dev/atkbdc
John Baldwin
jhb at freebsd.org
Tue Jun 7 18:02:13 UTC 2011
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:39:26 am Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2011 09:52 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> The whole point of this commit is to blacklist *recent* BIOS (or CSM)
> from probing keyboard typematic information, more specifically,
> recent Intel chipset platforms. They don't support many INT 15h/16h
> functions but only cause trouble at best. OTOH, I haven't seen such
> problems with AMD chipset systems and they all seem to have
> traditional entry points at the interrupt vector table, for example.
Err, but you didn't blacklist recent BIOS. You blacklist _all_ BIOS that use
entry points other than the ones from the UEFI spec, including BIOSes that
don't claim to support UEFI and the BIOS from the two systems I quoted.
> > You might as well just turn the check off on all machines at this
> > point rather than using completely arbitrary tests that are only
> > valid on a small fraction of the x86 universe.
>
> I don't think it is "completely" arbitrary. If it doesn't have the
> traditional entry points, it is very unlikely to support keyboard
> typematic in the first place. Please let me know if you have any
> counter example.
Umm, I just gave you two examples. UEFI is not a standard appropriate to the
vast majority of x86 BIOS implementations. It is far, far too narrow.
Put another way, we should assume that all non-recent BIOSes do not conform to
UEFI (since many older systems pre-date the UEFI spec for one) and that they
have all been effectively blacklisted now. Given that, you've now restricted
this functionality to only a subset of recent BIOSes and have blacklisted the
rest of the known universe.
However, the simplest fix is probably to just remove this entirely as I doubt
anyone really depends on the BIOS settings for these anyway.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list