svn commit: r217733 - in head: . share/man/man7

[Garrett Cooper]

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: bz
> Date: Sat Jan 22 22:57:28 2011
> New Revision: 217733
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/217733
>
> Log:
>  Properly document what the top-level `make tinderbox` does.
>
>  Reviewed by:  jmallett
>  MFC After:    3 days
>  X-MFC:                build.7 only

    As much as I like make universe and tinderbox, for the purpose of
development testing would it make sense if there was a tinderbox
target that actually died on its first failure? tinderbox and universe
seems to be useful when dealing with known breakage or when executing
periodic builds, but I don't know think it's as effective with
development testing, as for some of the stuff I just want to build on
something other than my host arch and another arch that isn't x86 (say
arm, mips, powerpc) just to make sure that I didn't break anything
endian wise (if the code is that nasty).
Thanks,
-Garrett