svn commit: r220416 - head/sys/netgraph
Julian Elischer
julian at freebsd.org
Thu Apr 7 19:54:11 UTC 2011
On 4/7/11 12:45 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:15:49PM +0200, Marko Zec wrote:
> M> On Thursday 07 April 2011 15:54:40 Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> M> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:40:10AM +0000, Marko Zec wrote:
> M> > M> Author: zec
> M> > M> Date: Thu Apr 7 11:40:10 2011
> M> > M> New Revision: 220416
> M> > M> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220416
> M> > M>
> M> > M> Log:
> M> > M> Properly unref ng_hub nodes on shutdown, so that we don't leak them.
> M> > M>
> M> > M> MFC after: 3 days
> M> > M>
> M> > M> Modified:
> M> > M> head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c
> M> > M>
> M> > M> Modified: head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c
> M> > M>
> M> > ===========================================================================
> M> >=== M> --- head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c Thu Apr 7 11:13:50 2011 (r220415) M>
> M> > +++ head/sys/netgraph/ng_hub.c Thu Apr 7 11:40:10 2011 (r220416) M> @@
> M> > -157,6 +157,8 @@ ng_hub_shutdown(node_p node)
> M> > M> const priv_p priv = NG_NODE_PRIVATE(node);
> M> > M>
> M> > M> free(priv, M_NETGRAPH_HUB);
> M> > M> + NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL);
> M> > M> + NG_NODE_UNREF(node);
> M> > M> return (0);
> M> > M> }
> M> >
> M> > Do we really need NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE()?
> M>
> M> Most probably not, though the majority of .shutdown method implementations in
> M> sys/netgraph do include a call to NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL), so I did a
> M> C/P from one of those for consistency. If there's a consensus that
> M> NG_NODE_SET_PRIVATE(node, NULL) in shutdown methods serves no useful purpose
> M> then we should do a sweep across all the existing nodes...
>
> My humble opinion is that they should be swept. At least to avoid more c/p
> in future.
>
> Julian?
>
my opinion goes with anyone who is willing to do the work :-)
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list