svn commit: r211276 - head/lib/libc/net
Hajimu UMEMOTO
ume at freebsd.org
Mon Oct 4 15:30:09 UTC 2010
Hi,
>>>>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:49:26 +0300
>>>>> Kostik Belousov <kostikbel at gmail.com> said:
kostikbel> I suspect there is some subtle issue with the commit present.
kostikbel> When getprotobyname_r() is unable to find the protocol, it seems
kostikbel> that established behaviour is to return 0 and set *protoent to NULL.
The behavior you mentioned is questionable to me. Though I cannot
find the manpage of getprotobyname_r(3), there is following
description in the manpage of gethostbyname_r(3) on CentOS:
Glibc2 also has reentrant versions gethostbyname_r() and
gethostbyname2_r(). These return 0 on success and non-zero on
error.
When getprotobyname_r(3) is unable to find the protocol, it should be
treated as error, IMHO. My intention is that when getprotobyname_r(3)
ends up with error but errno is zero, the return code should be
non-zero (-1).
kostikbel> The getprotobyname_r() in HEAD and stable/8, when the protocol
kostikbel> cannot be found, return whatever value was present in errno at the time
kostikbel> of the call.
In anyway, errno should be cleared. I've just committed to clear
errno for each method dispatch.
kostikbel> When run with the argument "tcp1" on Linux, I get
kostikbel> Res 0 errno 0 Success pres (nil)
kostikbel> On the recent FreeBSD I get
kostikbel> Res 25 errno 25 Inappropriate ioctl for device pres 0x0
kostikbel> (ENOTTY is from stdio).
Now, it shows:
Res -1 errno 22 Unknown error: 0 pres 0x0
(When strerror(3) is called with 0 for its argument, it set errno to
EINVAL.)
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
More information about the svn-src-all
mailing list