svn commit: r214984 - stable/8/lib/libproc

Mon Nov 8 15:19:32 UTC 2010

Hi,

>>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:06:12 +0000
>>>>> Rui Paulo <rpaulo at FreeBSD.org> said:

rpaulo> It's on my plans, but basename_r is not POSIX and there was a private discussion about it a couple of weeks ago. The conclusion is that we should adopt the Android semantics of basename_r().

I found the thread, and understood it.  However, I still wonderling if
breaking thread-safeness in proc_sym.c is okay, though it may not be
necessary.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/