svn commit: r194377 - stable/7/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal

[Dmitry Morozovsky]

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:

DS> > I think Dmitry means more that all the prop changes stuff clutters the actual 
DS> > commit messages.  I would like to see them removed from the subject line at 
DS> > least so that the subject line clearly shows where real changes are being 
DS> > made.
DS> 
DS> That's reasonable - but I would still very much like to see prop changes
DS> in the commit email.  It's not just svn:mergeinfo, there have also been
DS> cases of incorrect svn:keywords, and even someone who set svn:mime-type
DS> to application/octet-stream on a couple of files because they couldn't
DS> figure out the correct svn:keywords syntax.
DS> 
DS> BTW, if you do as Dmitry suggests, how will you handle props-only
DS> commits like r192599, r192646 or r192653?

As for last question: there are _only_ props changes lines in the changes list. 
This can be treated as a stop-case for changing subject at all (also, these 
cases are rather rare comparing to normal development/merging)


-- 
Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck at FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------