svn commit: r500480 - in head: Mk databases databases/rubygem-dbm databases/rubygem-dbm/files lang/ruby24 lang/ruby25
Mathieu Arnold
mat at FreeBSD.org
Fri May 3 07:48:27 UTC 2019
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 02:16:28PM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not in a strong position on this but it's up to the maintainer.
> File a new bug and suggest the maintainer to change the default option.
Not everything is up to the maintainer.
See https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html
For example, the part saying:
We reserve the right to modify the maintainer's submission to better
match existing policies and style of the Ports Collection without
explicit blessing from the submitter or the maintainer.
In this case, I would say that this applies.
> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 01:02:49PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
> > >>>>> Koichiro Iwao <meta at FreeBSD.org> said:
> >
> > meta> Log:
> > meta> lang/ruby2[45]: Remove dbm library and replace it with databases/rubygem-dbm
> >
> > meta> +OPTIONS_SINGLE_BACKEND= BDB GDBM LIBC QDBM
> > meta> +OPTIONS_DEFAULT= BDB
> >
> > It seems POLA violation to me. Further, now, there is no way to
> > access dbm 1.85 database from Ruby by default. LIBC should be
> > default, IMHO.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > --
> > Hajimu UMEMOTO
> > ume at mahoroba.org ume at FreeBSD.org
> > http://www.mahoroba.org/~ume/
> >
>
> --
> meta <meta at FreeBSD.org>
>
>
--
Mathieu Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20190503/c81d4729/attachment.sig>
More information about the svn-ports-head
mailing list