svn commit: r493354 - in head/sysutils: . py-bitrot

[Tobias Kortkamp]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:53:38AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:32:10AM +0100, Tobias Kortkamp wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:16:10AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 04:11:05AM -0500, Tobias Kortkamp wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > Sure, can you please contact the maintainer or upstream about it?
> > > 
> > > In this case (if upstream and maitainer fail to provide sensible port
> > > description), you as the committer should perform a quick review of the
> > > software and come up with our (FreeBSD's) own.  We should not offer a
> > > half-baked stuff to our users.  They should have some idea of what they
> > > are about to install.
> > 
> > Nonsense.  That's a good way to burnout completely.  I do not have
> > any stake in this port whatsoever beyond fulfilling a simple request
> > to add it to the tree.  You are asking way too much of me here.
> 
> With this kind of attitude, don't be surprized when someone decides to
> add an "rm -rf /" port to the tree. :-(

Sigh...  It seems you are accusing me of not reviewing this port
due to the not-good-enough-for-danfe package description which I
think is jumping to conclusions awfully fast.

If I missed something and if you have any evidence that this port
is malicious I'd like to hear about it, so that we can do the
appropriate thing like removing it again.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20190219/8da71ee8/attachment.sig>