svn commit: r469188 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg_replace

[Baptiste Daroussin]

On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 08:41:36AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > On 6 May, 2018, at 04:27, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 10:15:03AM +0000, Koichiro Iwao wrote:
> > > New Revision: 469188
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/469188
> > > 
> > > Log:
> > >   ports-mgmt/pkg_replace: Update to 20180424
> > > 
> > >   - Cleanup code
> > >   - Speed up and strictly check package's dependencies
> > >   - While here, pet portlint by using pkg-plist instead of PLIST_FILES
> > 
> > Could you explain what did you achieve by moving three-line PLIST_FILES
> > into pkg-plist?  How can "pet portlint" be a reason for a change while
> > we generally encourage converting <6-line pkg-plist's into PLIST_FILES?
> > 
> > ./danfe
> > 
> > > -
> > > -PLIST_FILES=	sbin/pkg_replace \
> > > -		man/man1/pkg_replace.1.gz \
> > > -		"@sample %%ETCDIR%%/pkg_replace.conf.sample"
> > 
> > Correct PLIST_FILES should read:
> > 
> > PLIST_FILES=	sbin/pkg_replace \
> > 		man/man1/pkg_replace.1.gz \
> > 		@sample\ etc/pkg_replace/pkg_replace.conf.sample
> > 
> > ./danfe
> 
> Sorry, Alexey, but portlint was right here. @sample and other macros should
> *never* appear in PLIST_FILES. Even if the port installs only a single file,
> if it’s a @sample, it goes in pkg-plist.
> 
Same why :)

Alexey is wrong imho about the '\' the quotes where fine, but he is right about
the replacement of the %%ETCDIR%%.

I don't understand why keywords should be forbiddent in PLIST_FILES macros?

The framework itself uses macros in PLIST_FILES

Best regards,
Bapt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/attachments/20180506/132a5bf0/attachment.sig>